May 6, 2011
Attorney General Eric Holder
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
By Phone:Department of Justice Main Switchboard - 202-514-2000
Office of the Attorney General Public Comment Line - 202-353-1555
Whitehouse FAX: 1-202-456-2461
Dear United States Attorney General Eric Holder
As a concerned Citizen of the United States of America, I am highly aware and concern about the injustices happening within the U.S. Justice System due to Prosecutorial Misconduct.
As a United States of American voting, taxpaying, concerned CITIZEN, I am asking for necessary changes to be made by Bills, Rules, Policies, Procedures, Laws, Codes, etc. to correct this out of control injustice being perpetrated upon the Citizens of the United States of America's Justice System. The Citizens are no longer willing to accept the lies, falsehoods, bribery, threats, hidden and not allowed evidence or twisting the truth, not allowed DNA Tests, false witnesses, and on and on the corruption continues to grow totally out of control.
No longer "immunity" allowed for elected, voted in, appointed, named into official capacities aka Czars, employees for federal and state government
(must add your name, address, phone if you choose)
A Concerned Citizen of The United States of America
May 3, 2011, 7:05 PM ET
Stevens Urges Congress to Crack Down on Prosecutorial Misconduct
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens said Supreme Court decisions have given local prosecutors impunity for violating constitutional rights, and urged Congress to respond by authorizing victims of misconduct to sue.
In a speech Monday night to the Equal Justice Initiative, which advocates for indigent defendants, Justice Stevens criticized the court’s March decision overturning a jury’s $14 million award to an innocent man who spent 14 years on death row after prosecutors concealed evidence that could have cleared him. (Click here to see the full text of Stevens’ speech.ARTICLE Prosecutorial Misconduct)
The case of Connick v. Thompson saw the court split 5-4 along its conservative- liberal divide. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas rejected the freed man’s theory that the New Orleans district attorney’s office was negligent for failing to train its staff to comply with longstanding precedents requiring prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to defendants.
Lawyers for the wrongly imprisoned man, John Thompson, made that argument because Supreme Court precedent requires proof that it was the local government’s policy to violate constitutional rights before it can be held liable.
Thompson’s lawyers “did not prove a pattern of similar violations” that was “the functional equivalent of a decision by the city itself to violate the Constitution,” Justice Thomas wrote. Stevens said Monday that the nature of the American criminal justice system—where most local prosecutors are elected—“creates a problem of imbalanced incentives that ought to be addressed at the state and national level.” Because district attorneys often run on tough-on-crime platforms, the pressures to ensure convictions far outweigh the rewards for respecting rights of the accused, Stevens said.
That could be fixed, he said, by making district attorneys liable when their subordinates commit outrageous violations of constitutional rights. Private-sector employees already are liable for their employees’ misconduct, under a legal doctrine called respondeat superior. The doctrine “provides a powerful continuing incentive for employers to make sure that their employees are adequately trained,” Stevens said, something “especially important where electoral incentives encourage abuse.” More important, he said, “it would produce a just result in cases like Thompson’s in which there is no dispute about the fact that he was harmed by conduct that flagrantly violated his constitutional rights.”
Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com
Prisons are, and always have been, a failed social experiment.
Email this also to the Lt. Governor of your State, which sometimes that is head of the Senate for your State, to your State Representatives for further attention concerning this corrupt injustice happening to America's Citizes
DISCLAIMER:People Against Prison Abuse aka PAPA website contains links to other websites, cases, news articles, commentaries, political viewpoints, etc. Links are here for the purpose of education, data, and research for those that are seeking information.All Links are "SEARCH AT YOUR OWN RISK".PAPA can "NOT" endorse or verify the accuracy of the contents of other websites.People Against Prison Abuse does "NOT" accept the responsibility or liability of other websites' contents.Inmate reports are backed up by copies of grievances, medical records, family testimony, contacts, witness statements, and legal documentation.PAPA can not guarantee the truth of any reports but we attempt to present the big picture as accurate as possible.All information is properties of others that PAPA can not accept responsibility for the contents of the reports...as said by Gary Waid..."am simply the recorder who listens when no one else will and the amplifier for the voiceless." Organizations are free to link to our site after approved request.PAPA retains the right to disconnect any links that is "NOT" to our mission purpose. Freedom of Speech is allowed without use of vulgar, slanderous, profanity, taking the Lord's name in vain wording.Each person is his/her free agent to decipher the accuracy for yourself as to the information found on this site.Accepting information, instructions, and any other information from PAPA's website and/or any links connected is at that person's "OWN RISK"."Fair Use" NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material for the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of The Prison and Judicial System of the United States. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes for their loved-ones that are incarcerated.For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use',you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. CITIZENS-in-ACTION because ENOUGH-is-ENOUGH!